Go On, Say It
Blind Pilot
picking up sound on the inner state
high in my breath letting in waste there will be time when the sleep I'm in covers me cold covers me thin I know I wake up forgetting which box this is in how I will keep you just how I left you |
my daughter once told me I know a lot now I'm strutting off with more than I've got a hitchhiker told me I don't talk a lot made me feel fine made me quiet if you had said it right instead of praying to us why how I will keep you just how I left you come on, say it right (x8) |
Analysis
Shifting in tone from apathy to regret in “Go On, Say It”,
the band Blind Pilot uses conflicting characterization, urban imagery, and solemn
allegory to argue that the meaning of one’s words changes if you don’t “say it
right.”
The narrator characterizes himself with a dichotomy between
his perspective and his daughter’s. His daughter tells him that he “knows a lot,”
implying a high level of respect for his intellect or character. However, in
the next line, the narrator says he’s “strutting off with more than [he’s] got,”
meaning he does not quite fit the description given by his daughter. These
contrasting perspectives give the narrator a complex character, alternating
between good and bad, depending on the object of perspective. This idea of relationship-driven
characterization becomes more important in context of the events unfolding
around the narrator.
Driving down the inner state, the narrator describes the
urban environment he’s passing through. He “picks up sound,” or music, on his
radio, letting it waste away on his breath. This scene sets the moody tone of
the piece as he proceeds to pick up a hitchhiker. Picking up the hitchhiker,
the narrator implies that he has nowhere to go and no ties to maintain. In a
more rural environment, this act would be seen as a kindness, but in the
narrator’s situation it’s seen as an odd act – and odder still by the
hitchhiker, who comments that the narrator doesn’t talk a lot. This urban
imagery separates the narrator from his relationships, leaving him with
feelings of being cold and thin. Without the perspective of his daughter, he
falls from the place of esteem given by her perspective to a lowly hitchhiker,
doing anything he can to reach his destination, or get away from his home.
Through his brief story, the narrator allegorically describes
how he left his family. Like a hitchhiker, he is trying to get away from
something. Without the support of his daughter, he feels like a loser. The
narrator says that “if you [his wife] had said it right,” he wouldn’t have
left: this implies a certain disconnect between the narrator and his supporting
characters which would fit perfectly with the perspective of an unhappy wife.
This wife was just “praying to us why,” which the narrator sees as a useless
act. The narrator asserts that if his wife had ‘said it right’ he wouldn’t have
left, or would have been less likely to put his family in a box and try to leave
them “just as he left [them].”
While the narrator doesn’t explicitly state the conflict
between him and his family, he builds up the scenario in “Go On, Say It” with a
very small number of lines. This conflict between characters creates multiple
view points of the narrator, creating even more conflict within the narrator.
He just wishes that his wife would have “said it right,” so that he might have
avoided leaving them in the state he did.
No comments:
Post a Comment